The firm's positions disappear in the first draft.
Trace how approved precedent becomes a draft. Measure first-draft acceptance and the partner time needed to correct standard positions.
Business law
Make the first draft worth reviewing.
Your partners should be applying judgment, but inconsistent positions and answers they can't verify turn review into another drafting pass. We find the cause and build around the standards your firm needs to uphold.
For managing partners, corporate practice leaders, COOs and knowledge or innovation teams.
Where to look first
Follow the work
that keeps getting stuck.
AI use is rising, but useful output isn't.
Observe what happens after an AI answer: checking, rewriting and completing the matter. Usage alone doesn't show whether the tool helps attorneys finish.
Sensitive matter data limits the options.
Define access, deployment and verification requirements with your technical and risk teams before deciding how the system should work.
From corporate and business-law practices
What changed in practice.
Business Law
Decreased partner review time by 77% and saved $200K per year in Cloud AI in 12 weeks
We put approved positions into drafting and helped replace their old AI tools. Partner review fell from 90 to 20 minutes per primary deal document, and first-draft acceptance reached 78%.
Read the case study ↗Legal
Increased AI adoption from 32% to 72% and eliminated $1.7M per year in OpEx in 8 weeks
We brought sensitive AI work in-house and cut rework from 83% to 24%. Their firm dropped its usage mandate, but adoption still rose from 32% to 72%.
Read the case study ↗What we'd examine
One drafting or knowledge workflow. Agree the work unit, review criteria and permitted evidence with the practice owner before collecting any matter information.
What we'd measure
Accepted first drafts, partner review minutes, AI rework, verified answers and ongoing tool costs.
Your team collects the evidence with our kit. We review it, explain the likely local bottleneck and give you a first test with an estimate of the skills, effort and costs needed to act.
Two consultations are included, with the written report delivered before the findings call.
Will our lawyers keep control of legal judgment?
Yes. We define what the system can do, what evidence it must provide and where an attorney must review or decide. Your policies and the agreed scope guide access and deployment.
Put a useful next step in motion